The Jewish People, Inc.

May 15, 2008 at 4:59 pm 2 comments

STAR’s Rabbi Hayim Herring recent blog entry, The Jewish People Inc: A Study On How Synagogues Develop is clever… and brings up an interesting question. Herring likens the development of the Jewish people, to the development of a company or corporation.

We began as a family owned business (Abraham through Jacob). Jacob moves the company because of economic developments. It prospers and spins off into 12 different divisions. We experience a hostile takeover, Egyptian enslavement, which takes us off mission. A few dissenters, Moses and Aaron, try to steer the company back towards its founding mission and a return to the corporate headquarters.

Because of years with lack of corporate focus, Moses ‘hires’ an outside organizational consultant – Jethro. Herring continues the story with great expertise, but I want to stop here. I recently worked with a large synagogue on long term strategic planning and organizational development. I recommended they use a non-Jewish consultant, one who is well-known in the church world but who had never worked with a synagogue. Knowing this consultant and his work well, I knew he would be a perfect match for the synagogue. Fortunately, I was right and the consultation was (and is) working very well. This congregation, which some deemed dysfunctional beyond repair, is well on its way back to health, vitality, and mission focus.

In some respects I was lucky. But I had an ulterior motive in recommending this consultant. I have nothing against synagogue consultants. Many are excellent change facilitators. But the change they facilitate is sometimes shrouded in a ‘business as usual’ paradigm. Many times, synagogue consultants are focused on getting the congregation back to stasis, a state of no change, what Larry Hoffman calls the ‘default’ mode. I think this is, in part, because rabbis and synagogue leaders don’t know what they don’t know. This synagogue was willing to venture outside their comfort zone, the default Jewish world, to see what they didn’t know that might be possible. The consultant recently commented to me, “I had no presuppositions about how synagogues work. I think if I’d been an insider my presuppositions would have clouded the work.”

Might the synagogue world take a lesson from this congregation’s experience? Moses went to his most trusted advisor, his father-in-law, for leadership advice. He didn’t care that Jethro was not part of the tribe. He was the best resource to address the issue. Synagogues might consider this model.

Stay tuned for part 2 – what the consultant discovered about synagogues!

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Judaism, Synagogue Studies. Tags: , .

Top rabbis The Jewish People, Inc. Part 2: There’s a goy in the house!

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Monique Cuvelier  |  May 29, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    This reminds me of a conversation I had today. I was talking to a 26-year-old who works for a Jewish foundation that funds many web ventures. Yet, the foundation is giving no concerted thought to what kind of technology might help achieve their mission and is taking a conservative approach to new technologies. I don’t blame them, frankly. It’s often smarter to see what’s going to stick rather than throwing money at a new idea.

    But when I asked this person what kinds of websites he uses in his work life, he mentioned a handful of news sites. When I asked him what he used in his personal life, YouTube.com and Facebook were at the top of the list.

    The surprising thing to me wasn’t that he’s using community-building tools like YouTube and Facebook, but that there was no intersection between his personal and business web use.

    It says to me there’s a lack of a technical culture in many Jewish nonprofits. I think looking not only to outside consultants can help, but also looking to younger workers and what they do on a personal basis can help open possibilities.

    Reply
  • 2. rebaaron  |  May 29, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    I think you’ve pegged it – narrowing the disconnect between the Jewish and secular worlds, i.e. being responsive to the needs of the community, is absolutley lacking. And, absolutely necessary!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Archives


%d bloggers like this: